Board Features

While the X299 Gaming Pro Carbon is packed with many of the same features that we have seen on previous MSI models - like PCIe slot and memory slot reinforcement, M.2 Shield, Mystic Light RGB LED lighting - MSI has unveiled some new ideas like user-replaceable heatsink covers and mounting points for 3D printed accessories. MSI has also included two sets of gold and silver colored heatsink covers, so you can swap out the black faux carbon fiber inserts that are found on the rear I/O shroud, the MOSFET heatsink, the chipset heatsink, or the shroud covering the audio section.

MSI X299 Gaming Pro Carbon AC
Warranty Period 3 Years
Product Page Link
Price Amazon US
Size ATX
CPU Interface LGA2066
Chipset Intel X299
Memory Slots (DDR4) Eight DDR4
Supporting 128GB
Quad Channel
Up to 4266+ MHz
Network Connectivity Intel I219-V
Onboard Audio Realtek ALC1220
PCIe Slots for Graphics (from CPU) 4 x PCIe 3.0
 - x16
 - x16/x16
 - x16/x16/x8
With 44-lane CPU.
 - x16
 - x16/x8
 - x8/x8/x8
With 28-lane CPU.
 - x8
 - x8/x8
With 16-lane CPU.
PCIe Slots for Other (from PCH) 2 x PCIe 3.0 x1
1 x PCIe 3.0 x4
Onboard SATA Eight, RAID 0/1/5/10
Onboard M.2 2 x PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe or SATA, RAID 0/1
Onboard U.2 1 x PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe
USB 3.1 Gen2 1 x Type-A
1 x Type-C
1 x Type-C Header
2 x ASMedia ASM3142 Controller
USB 3.0 3 x Rear Panel (ASMedia ASM1074)
1 x Rear Panel (Chipset)
4 x Via Headers (Chipset)
USB 2.0 3 x Rear Panel (Chipset)
4 x Via Headers (Chipset)
Power Connectors 1 x 24-pin ATX
1 x 8-pin CPU
1 x 4-pin CPU
Fan Headers 1 x CPU (4-pin)
1 x Water Pump (4-pin)
4 x CHA/SYS (4-pin)
IO Panel Clear CMOS & BIOS FLASHBACK+ Buttons
1 x Combination PS/2
3 x USB 2.0 (Chipset)
2 x Wi-Fi Antenna Jacks (Intel)
4 x USB 3.0 (ASMedia)
1 x Network RJ-45 (Intel)
1 x USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-A (ASMedia)
1 x USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C (ASMedia)
5 x Audio Jacks + 1 x S/PDIF
Other Features TPM Module Connector
Clear CMOS Jumper
Slow Mode Jumper
GAME BOOST knob
Power/Reset Buttons
Multi-BIOS Switch
RGB LED Connector
Front Panel Header
Virtual RAID on CPU connector (VRAID1)
Front Audio Header

Since the X299 chipset is so similar to the Z270, it should come as no surprise that the LGA2066 platform doesn't offer anything drastically new on the connectivity front. Support for VROC is the only exception, though that requires a Skylake-X processor and a pricey hardware key from Intel if you want to unlock the more complex functionality. Frankly, given that the Realtek ALC1220 and Intel I219-V are known entities, what interests us the most is MSI's use of the ASMedia ASM3142 USB 3.1 Gen2 controller - two of them, in fact - for the rear I/O ports and the internal USB Type-C port header. Another interesting addition is the Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 module that occupies the onboard M.2 Key-E slot. This 802.11ac Wi-Fi/Bluetooth 4.2 module is not strictly new, but it has not found its way to any previous motherboard generation. However, since it's still just a basic dual-band 867Mbps solution it is hard to get excited when some competing X299 motherboards are offering cutting-edge 802.11ad (WiGig) wireless connectivity (albeit at a higher price point).

In The Box

When you open this motherboard's packaging, you are greeted by two separate sections. The top half holds the motherboard in an anti-static bag, while the bottom half contains the numerous bundled accessories, software DVD and documentation.

When you lay out the accessories, you get the following:

In no particular order, the bundled accessories consists of a manual, quick installation guide, SATA cable labels, software/driver DVD, MSI Gaming case badge, rear I/O cover, SLI HB bridge, four SATA cables, Two Wi-Fi antennas, RGB LED Y-splitter cable, two sets of heatsink replacement covers, and twelve 3D X-Mounting standoffs. Overall, it's a pretty decent assortment of accessories, though we would have liked another one or two sets of SATA cables.

Overclocking

Since this platform launch was more than a little rushed, at least with respect to last minute foibles, we didn't really had enough hands-on time to manually determine the overclocking limits of our 10-core Core i9-7900X processor. Having said that, this was the perfect opportunity to probe the automatic overclocking capabilities of this X299 Gaming Pro Carbon AC. With a total of 8 Game Boost levels available, in either the BIOS or the Command Center utility, it really was just a matter of selecting our desired frequency target and within seconds the overclock preset was applied.

In our testing, Level 1 merely set the standard Turbo frequency - 4.3GHz- across all cores, while the aptly named Level 11 pushed the core frequency to a stratospheric 5.0Ghz at 1.425V. While we could load Windows at Level 11, stability was essentially nonexistent.

Dialing things back a little to Level 10 saw our processor running at 4.9GHz at 1.40V. While we could toil around Windows, and it would pass even pass some of our lighter benchmarks, loading up all the cores in any stress test instantly resulted in a system crash. This was clearly due to hitting thermal limits, since using either a Corsair Hydro H110i GT or an surprisingly capable Prolimatech Mega Shadow heatsink, we consistently saw temperatures climb into the dreaded mid-to-upper 90C range. We strongly suspect that every conventional heatsink or all-in-on liquid cooler will be overwhelmed by the amount of heat a i9-7900X can radiate at anything approaching 1.40Vcore. If you have an air conditioning unit nearby, we suggest that you crank that to Level 10.

Dialing things back even further, Level 8 set the frequency to 4.8GHz at 1.375V, which resulted in a small but appreciable decrease in heat output. We were able to run OCCT for a moment, but once again temperatures would skyrocket until the inevitable system crash. If we can manually get the Vcore down to the 1.30-1.25V, and massage the other system settings, we strongly suspect that 4.8GHz will be a realistic target our particular chip with the right cooling.

Ultimately, we settled on Level 2, which meant 4.5Ghz at 1.30V. At that level, we could run OCCT for as long as we were willing to ignore the still redlined CPU core temperatures. Obviously, we did not bother enabling the "AVX Capable Linpack" option since that would once again crash the system.

Overall, we can't fault the MSI X299 Gaming Pro Carbon AC for anything since the processor - or more accurately processor cooling - is the bottleneck at the moment. The Game Boost feature has a been a reliable overclocking tool for a few generations now, and that appears to also apply to this new platform.

Visual Inspection Test Bed and Benchmark Overview
Comments Locked

24 Comments

View All Comments

  • sonny73n - Friday, September 22, 2017 - link

    "Overclocking is done at your own risk and I see no reason why Intel should get taken to task over not supporting a person that by all rights should know they're trying to operate outside of the envelope to eek out a slightly higher benchmark score while reaping little to no real world benefit for all their effort and expenses"

    My i5 OCed to 5Ghz which is 26% performance gain over stock clock. Which means every time I use Handbrake to transcode my videos, I can save about 25% of my time and I do video encoding quite a lot. That's some real world benefit for me. Secondly, I don't see the need to upgrade my CPU every year nor having the money to do so. So, having a OC-able CPU is another benefit. That's why I bought a K series CPU instead of a non-K.
  • sonny73n - Friday, September 22, 2017 - link

    By the way, there's no need for another obstacle between the CPU and HSF. I have never seen a CPU with lid in a laptop. So why not de-lid them?
  • BrokenCrayons - Friday, September 22, 2017 - link

    For home use, that's perfectly reasonable. You know the risks and you're accepting them and you're pinching a little extra life out of your system. In a production environment, overclocking is very uncommon because system life cycles are shorter and because time is money so new computers are purchased to gain that 25% back in increased productivity. Intel's primary customers are OEMs that sell to businesses and to non-overclocking home users. The fact that K processors even exist is only half-hearted nod to a small market segment in order to keep the most vocal parts of the enthusiast community from actively working to tarnish the company's brand name. It's important to them to acknowledge that group and appease it because doing so adds investment value versus the fairly low added costs of producing unlocked chips (for which they can charge premiums...nevermind the added "performance" chipset costs) but this is all about maximizing profits through playing up to the emotions of those few customers.
  • sonny73n - Sunday, September 24, 2017 - link

    With inadequate cooling and power in mobile devices, no sense to build them with unlocked CPUs. With desktop, most rational people would choose one with an unlocked CPU unless they don't see the needs for extra power. Because new CPUs performance only increase in average about 15% over previous generation, and likely sockets change for each gen especially with Intel, I'd rather get a system with an unlocked CPU to extend its usefulness. Home-build or pre-build, for home or office, there's not much of a difference if one has some common sense.

    Obviously you have very little knowledge about microprocessors, together with other computer components in general and how they work. You also have no clue about the CPU market nor common sense. Do you know that you can overclock your CPU with 1 click via MB UEFI?
  • BrokenCrayons - Monday, September 25, 2017 - link

    I don't understand the need to make personal attacks, but you can continue this conversation without my participation.
  • prateekprakash - Thursday, September 21, 2017 - link

    Wouldn't it be a nice feature to have the power and reset buttons in the rear io too; that way one may skip the front panel power/reset connections if one wishes to?
  • DanNeely - Thursday, September 21, 2017 - link

    nothing could be grander than accidentally hitting reset while fumbling around behind the case with a USB/etc cable trying to find a plug.
  • CheapSushi - Friday, September 22, 2017 - link

    As if you don't also have a USB port on the front of your case...next to the power & reset button too.... Nah, lets just find something to complain about.
  • prateekprakash - Saturday, September 23, 2017 - link

    Okay, then maybe a bios setting option to turn off the rear panel power/reset button, for those who would rather prefer front panel button...
  • halcyon - Friday, September 22, 2017 - link

    Are the DPC latency results really so varied on X299 platfrom? HardOCP got 81us for MSI X299 SLI Plus:
    https://www.hardocp.com/article/2017/09/05/msi_x29...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now