Test Bed and Setup

As per our processor testing policy, we take a premium category motherboard suitable for the socket, and equip the system with a suitable amount of memory running at the manufacturer's maximum supported frequency. This is also typically run at JEDEC subtimings where possible. It is noted that some users are not keen on this policy, stating that sometimes the maximum supported frequency is quite low, or faster memory is available at a similar price, or that the JEDEC speeds can be prohibitive for performance. While these comments make sense, ultimately very few users apply memory profiles (either XMP or other) as they require interaction with the BIOS, and most users will fall back on JEDEC supported speeds - this includes home users as well as industry who might want to shave off a cent or two from the cost or stay within the margins set by the manufacturer. Where possible, we will extend out testing to include faster memory modules either at the same time as the review or a later date.

Test Setup
AMD TR3 Threadripper 3970X
Threadripper 3960X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Zenith II Extreme (BIOS 0601)
CPU Cooler Thermaltake Riing 360 CLC
DRAM Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 8x8 GB DDR4-3200
GPU MSI GTX 1080 Gaming 8G
PSU Corsair AX860i
SSD Crucial MX500 2TB
OS Windows 10 1909

For our motherboards, we are using the latest firmware. It should be noted that our Intel tests do not have the latest Intel security updates for JCC and others, as the motherboard vendors for the models we used have not implemented them yet.

The latest AMD TR3 benchmarks were run by Gavin Bonshor, while I attended Supercomputing in Denver last week. Unfortunately both Intel and AMD decided to sample processors before the annual trade show conference, with launches only a couple of days after the show finished. As a result, our testing has been split between Gavin and myself, and we have endeavored to ensure parity through my automated testing suite.

Also, our compile test seems to have broken itself when we used Windows 10 1909, and due to travel we have not had time to debug why it is no longer working. We hope to get this test up and running in the new year, along with an updated test suite.

We must thank the following companies for kindly providing hardware for our multiple test beds. Some of this hardware is not in this test bed specifically, but is used in other testing.

Hardware Providers
Sapphire RX 460 Nitro MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X OC Crucial MX200 +
MX500 SSDs
Corsair AX860i +
AX1200i PSUs
G.Skill RipjawsV,
SniperX, FlareX
Crucial Ballistix
DDR4
Silverstone
Coolers
Silverstone
Fans
Zen2 Platform for HEDT - Improvements over Last-Gen CPU Performance: Rendering Tests
Comments Locked

245 Comments

View All Comments

  • lobz - Monday, November 25, 2019 - link

    As well as the quality. Yes, dramatically.
  • dscott1414 - Monday, November 25, 2019 - link

    Totally awesome article. Could you correct the very last sentence?
  • icoreaudience - Monday, November 25, 2019 - link

    When will Anandtech display a modern compression algorithm within encoding tests ?
    Zstandard comes with a built-in benchmark compatible with multithreading, an ideal case to test threadripper !
  • Flying Aardvark - Monday, November 25, 2019 - link

    Fully patched Intel microcode and Windows?
  • yeeeeman - Monday, November 25, 2019 - link

    Probably yes since 10980xe performance is lower than 9980xe
  • blppt - Monday, November 25, 2019 - link

    I'm hesitant to take any of these mega-core intel benchmarks as accurate, though--- the 7980/9980 Geekbench 4 scores are laughably low (9980 should be north of 50K, not 30K, at the very least), so there's definitely something wrong with AT's setup for these cpus.

    Maybe the other benches are correct, but GB4 at least is messed up.
  • fackamato - Monday, November 25, 2019 - link

    Nope, mentioned in the article - BIOS update not available.

    So fully patched, the Intel results would be somewhat lower.
  • BrainWaveCC - Monday, November 25, 2019 - link

    I see a couple of "Threadripper 3950X" references where I expected to see "Threadripper 3960X" instead. For instance:

    "The interesting question here of course is, how is this UMA domain setup for the Threadripper 3950X and 3970X?"
  • dcmsnd - Monday, November 25, 2019 - link

    May i ask you guys how did you got 44s with 2990wx in Corona benchmark ? Im getting 41s with stock clocks (2933cl14 memory, Win1909, latest AMD drivers, latest bios)

    41 vs 44 is quite big difference in percentage for such small time frame.

    41s vs 34s AND 44s vs 34s is also a lot of difference.
  • Dug - Monday, November 25, 2019 - link

    I would like to know this too.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now