At AMD’s 2014 GPU Product Showcase, AMD has just announced their upcoming next generation product lineup. In an unusual move they’re announcing a complete top-to-bottom of products at all once, rather than announcing products piecemeal as they’re ready for launch.

The upcoming generation of products will be branded R7 and R9. R7 will be AMD’s lower-end mainstream parts, while R9 will be for their higher-end enthusiast parts.

Notably, AMD is taking care to note that certain features are only available on certain cards. The R9 series is Direct3D 11.2 compliant, for example, but the R7 was not mentioned as being so. Meanwhile R7 260X, R9 290, and R9 290X will have new audio features (more on that later), but not R9 270X or R9 280X. So it’s likely that some of the chips in this stack are rebadged/rebranded Southern Islands (7000 series) parts, though it’s not clear which are what.

The flagship of the new family will be the R9 290X. AMD isn’t releasing the full specs for it at this time, though they’re quoting 5 TFLOPs of GPU performance. It will come with 4GB of memory, with a total memory bandwidth of over 300GB/sec, which assuming a 512bit memory bus would put memory clockspeeds at equal to or greater than 4.7GHz. Unlike their other parts AMD is not announcing a price quite yet.

The GPU behind 290X has yet to be named. But AMD has already told us that it has more than 6 billion transistors; this would put it between Tahiti and NVIDIA’s GK110 in transistor count.

AMD 2014 GPU Specification Comparison
  R9 290X R9 280X R9 270X R7 260X R7 250
Firestrike Score N/A >6800 >5500 >3700 >2000
Transistor Count >6B N/A N/A N/A N/A
AMD TrueAudio Yes No No Yes No
Pre-Order Date 10/03/2013 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Launch Price N/A $299 $199 $139 <$89

Below the 290X will be the R9 280X. This will be a card with 3GB of RAM, and it has a price tag of $299. It’s not clear whether this is the same GPU as in 290X or not, and in lieu of specs AMD has given us a single benchmark: 3DMark Firemark, where it scores better than 6800.

Further down yet is the R9 270X. This is a 2GB card with a $199 price tag. AMD is listing a Firestrike score of greater than 5500.

Finally, at the bottom of the stack are the R7 parts, R7 260X and R7 250. 260X is a 2GB card for $139, with a Firestrike score of over 3700. Meanwhile 250 is AMD’s sub-$100 card, hitting retail at $89 with 1GB of RAM and a Firestrike score of over 2000.

Update: Now with official product pictures

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • The Von Matrices - Thursday, September 26, 2013 - link

    I highly doubt that. Oland has only 384SP, so I see no way that it can achieve a Firestrike score of 2000 unless it is clocked at a ridiculous clock speed ~2GHz, which is unrealistic.
  • lopper - Thursday, September 26, 2013 - link

    The hd 7730, with 384 SP, gets a firestrike of 1600. Seems likely to me.
  • lopper - Thursday, September 26, 2013 - link

    The R7 260 looks like Cape Verde.
  • n0b0dykn0ws - Thursday, September 26, 2013 - link

    When these cards are tested for the site, pretty please test for 23.976! I know Haswell is the closest to the mark, and I really want to see AMD and nVidia get there too!
  • silverblue - Friday, September 27, 2013 - link

    I thought both AMD and nVIDIA were already there?
  • lopper - Thursday, September 26, 2013 - link

    The hd 7730 gddr5 is capable of 1600 in firestrike. Seems likely enough. That card has 384 sharers,
  • mapesdhs - Friday, September 27, 2013 - link

    Ryan, are the quoted Firestrike scores an overall test score (in which case what
    was the test platform? CPU-type matters), or the GPU-only score? And do they
    refer to just Firestrike, or rather Firestrike Extreme?

  • Dman23 - Friday, September 27, 2013 - link

    Sweet! these look awesome and quite powerful
  • smitty123 - Saturday, September 28, 2013 - link

    why the f do they mess with us with these numbers ?

    just put something simple: R7 and R7e for enthousiast.

    and what does the x in 290x stand for ?

    i hate amd now, they lost me.
  • piroroadkill - Tuesday, October 1, 2013 - link

    I agree that the numbering system is total bollocks, but it's not a reason to hate the cards themselves.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now