Final Words

The Dell Venue 8 is a tablet that I really wanted to like. From the moment I unboxed it, it had a level of craftsmanship that I have seldom seen in other Android tablets. The aluminum casing is rigid and sturdy, which is a breath of fresh air compared to the flex that many plastic tablets exhibit. It's extremely thin, and it manages to be lightweight without going overboard and feeling like an empty demo unit. Although the design of the bezels gives it a somewhat unbalanced appearance, the Venue 8 is still a very well designed tablet.

It's clear that Dell has aspirations of becoming a serious competitor in the high end tablet space. Although the Venue 8 gets high marks for its design, a tablet can't survive on that alone. It needs to hold its own against the competition in every area, from the design, to the display, to the SoC. When you intend to sell a device for $399, there's very little room to compromise on any aspects without falling short of the competition.

Going over the Venue 8's strengths beyond its design, we find that it does quite well in our CPU tests. The Intel Atom Z3580 manages to hold its own against the competition's high end ARM SoCs, and at this point the list of applications that don't run on Intel devices consists of only a tiny handful of Android NDK apps. Its speed also doesn't come at the cost of battery life, with the Venue 8 trading blows with the competition in our battery tests.

Unfortunately, the Venue 8 isn't able to stand up to the competition in several other aspects. At $399, the Venue 8 is going right up against the Nexus 9, and there are just too many areas where it falls short. The most significant in my view is the display. The color accuracy is honestly unacceptable for a $399 device, and a 2560x1600 PenTile RGBG display has more subpixel pattern visibility than an 8.9" 2048x1536 RGB display. The GPU performance of the Venue 8 also leaves much to be desired compared to Tegra K1-64. It's not bad, but the competition is just a lot better.

There's also the issue of software. Not applications, but Android itself. The Venue 8 ships with KitKat, and there's no solid information on when it will be upgraded to Lollipop. Beyond that point, buyers just have to hope that Dell continues to provide updates, while with the Nexus 9 they're guaranteed them from Google for a fairly long period of time. Venue 8 users also have to deal with the OS and preinstalled software eating up 7GB of their 16GB device, and while microSD cards can expand media storage, they can't expand application storage.

While I could go on and on and compare every aspect of the Venue 8 to other tablets, I think the data speaks for itself. The build quality is much better than that of the Nexus 9, there's no question about that. However, in every other aspect it either matches the Nexus 9, or ranges from not quite as good to significantly inferior. With that in mind, it's hard to give a recommendation for the Venue 8 given its price. I strongly value good design and build quality, and the Venue 8 holds that over the Nexus 9. Unfortunately, that advantage isn't enough to outweigh all of the disadvantages. The Venue 8 just isn't enough to become my recommended Android tablet for $399. It's clear that Dell has put a lot of effort into creating the Venue 8, but they still have a ways to go.

Camera, WiFi, Misc
Comments Locked

89 Comments

View All Comments

  • darkich - Thursday, March 12, 2015 - link

    your Intel *bias*
  • Michael Bay - Thursday, March 12, 2015 - link

    Consider how faster Atom became when Baytrail came. That`s generational improvement the article is talking about.
    Intel also always will be on superior process node compared to everyone else.

    It`s only a question of supplying better GPU part.
  • lucam - Thursday, March 12, 2015 - link

    This GPU is good, but not enough maybe for a tablet.
  • darkich - Friday, March 13, 2015 - link

    Lol.
    Consider how faster Cortex became from A9-A72. Around 400%.
    Astonishing achievement that Intel can only have pipe dreams about.
  • LukaP - Friday, March 13, 2015 - link

    Considering Intel managed to get Broadwell into 4.5W space i wouldnt be too worried about them. Their next gen atoms will be on par with any arm design. Dont forget that they have atleast one node advantage (with 10nm that will be two nodes) and ALOT more money to pour into RND.

    Look at what they are doing with iGPU performance. they realised AMD was stealing their market there, and came up with the Gen8 Iris Pro.

    Same will happen in mobile. when intel wants something it takes it. Plus it helps that they can rely on the Intel Inside branding.
  • pSupaNova - Friday, March 13, 2015 - link

    Every generation we hear the same arguments spouted by the Intel Crowd, then when the mobile products hit the market ARM based Socs beat Intels hands down.

    Intel can't own this market big players like Samsung & Apple who manufacture devices and design ARM SOCS will not let them gain a big enough foothold in the market.

    The Mobile SOC race is over ARM won and Intel are now scrambling for the scraps.
  • Michael Bay - Friday, March 13, 2015 - link

    Samsung SoCs are the ones scrambling for the scraps even within Samsung lineup, and Apple will always will be a thing in itself.
    This battle is far from over, and rushing to proclaim someone a winner only uncovers one`s uncertainty.
  • darkich - Friday, March 13, 2015 - link

    That 4.5W Broadwell costs over $250, and is matched(in raw computing performance) by a $50 2W Exynos 7420, and almost matched by last year's 20nm A8X..

    Seriously, there is no competition whatsoever. Facts are overwhelmingly in favor of ARM based chips.
  • darkich - Friday, March 13, 2015 - link

    Also, so far Intel always had a node advantage but trailed behind ARM despite of that.
    Now even that advantage is melting away.
    Samsung is actually the first to have tested a 10nm process
  • Michael Bay - Friday, March 13, 2015 - link

    Intel process advantage "melting away"?
    Nice mantra.

    It took them literally years and years to get where intel was two years ago process-wise, and then it`s not even real 14nm. You`ll get years after years of Samsung milking it completely dry, then TSMC yields will finally catch up and they`ll have to think about moving to 10.

    Intel will be somewhere below 5 by then.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now