Final Words

The Dell Venue 8 is a tablet that I really wanted to like. From the moment I unboxed it, it had a level of craftsmanship that I have seldom seen in other Android tablets. The aluminum casing is rigid and sturdy, which is a breath of fresh air compared to the flex that many plastic tablets exhibit. It's extremely thin, and it manages to be lightweight without going overboard and feeling like an empty demo unit. Although the design of the bezels gives it a somewhat unbalanced appearance, the Venue 8 is still a very well designed tablet.

It's clear that Dell has aspirations of becoming a serious competitor in the high end tablet space. Although the Venue 8 gets high marks for its design, a tablet can't survive on that alone. It needs to hold its own against the competition in every area, from the design, to the display, to the SoC. When you intend to sell a device for $399, there's very little room to compromise on any aspects without falling short of the competition.

Going over the Venue 8's strengths beyond its design, we find that it does quite well in our CPU tests. The Intel Atom Z3580 manages to hold its own against the competition's high end ARM SoCs, and at this point the list of applications that don't run on Intel devices consists of only a tiny handful of Android NDK apps. Its speed also doesn't come at the cost of battery life, with the Venue 8 trading blows with the competition in our battery tests.

Unfortunately, the Venue 8 isn't able to stand up to the competition in several other aspects. At $399, the Venue 8 is going right up against the Nexus 9, and there are just too many areas where it falls short. The most significant in my view is the display. The color accuracy is honestly unacceptable for a $399 device, and a 2560x1600 PenTile RGBG display has more subpixel pattern visibility than an 8.9" 2048x1536 RGB display. The GPU performance of the Venue 8 also leaves much to be desired compared to Tegra K1-64. It's not bad, but the competition is just a lot better.

There's also the issue of software. Not applications, but Android itself. The Venue 8 ships with KitKat, and there's no solid information on when it will be upgraded to Lollipop. Beyond that point, buyers just have to hope that Dell continues to provide updates, while with the Nexus 9 they're guaranteed them from Google for a fairly long period of time. Venue 8 users also have to deal with the OS and preinstalled software eating up 7GB of their 16GB device, and while microSD cards can expand media storage, they can't expand application storage.

While I could go on and on and compare every aspect of the Venue 8 to other tablets, I think the data speaks for itself. The build quality is much better than that of the Nexus 9, there's no question about that. However, in every other aspect it either matches the Nexus 9, or ranges from not quite as good to significantly inferior. With that in mind, it's hard to give a recommendation for the Venue 8 given its price. I strongly value good design and build quality, and the Venue 8 holds that over the Nexus 9. Unfortunately, that advantage isn't enough to outweigh all of the disadvantages. The Venue 8 just isn't enough to become my recommended Android tablet for $399. It's clear that Dell has put a lot of effort into creating the Venue 8, but they still have a ways to go.

Camera, WiFi, Misc
Comments Locked

89 Comments

View All Comments

  • darkich - Friday, March 13, 2015 - link

    "Intel will be somewhere below 5 by then."
    Oh I see, you're nothing but a TROLL
  • Michael Bay - Saturday, March 14, 2015 - link

    So all you have is an eteranl looser`s excuse.
    Typical of ARM fanatics.
  • Michael Bay - Friday, March 13, 2015 - link

    Oh please. Intel has to improve a much more complex architecture and simultaneously drive power consumption down, while ARM is touching the heat ceiling on current complexity. Those issues will only exacerbate in next iterations.
  • GNUminex_l_cowsay - Thursday, March 12, 2015 - link

    Considering that there isn't much you can do with a tablet besides viewing content. How could something with such a bad screen possibly be useful?
  • extide - Thursday, March 12, 2015 - link

    Wow, those CPU scores are terrible. Even nVidia can roll a custom ARM core and be faster, and I'm not even talking about the GPU part, only CPU. This is sad Intel, c'mon you're letting me down! ATOM NEEDS TO GO. Use Core-M and then for the cheaper segments Intel needs to roll a custom ARM-v8 core. It's time!
  • djc208 - Thursday, March 12, 2015 - link

    Remember that in some cases the Atom CPU has to do a real-time conversion from ARM to X86 on any app that doesn't provide an X86 build. I notice that on my MeMo Pad some things just don't run, or don't run right even though they're fine on my phone. Admittedly the MeMo has far less RAM, but it's still glitchy on some apps. But it also means that some stuff just isn't as responsive because the CPU is trying to translate and run at the same time. Which admittedly is kind of what the Tegra K1 is doing too, just without the optimization library.
  • extide - Thursday, March 12, 2015 - link

    That only happens on apps that are native code, which is basically only things like full-screen 3d games. All of the main google apps, browsers, and common stuff you use is java, so it has no additional translation overhead compared to running on ARM.

    However, the truth is that it's the end result that matters.
  • tipoo - Thursday, March 12, 2015 - link

    Browsers aren't java, they're native.
  • staiaoman - Thursday, March 12, 2015 - link

    and THIS is why we patiently wait for anand's review before buying a tablet, instead of going off of the "FIRST!" articles from other sites. Well done, guys. Thorough as always.
  • Refuge - Friday, March 13, 2015 - link

    Haha agreed, they are my guiding light.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now