Setup Notes and Platform Analysis

Our review sample of the Intel NUC11TNKi5 came with all necessary components pre-installed, and we carried them over to the Newton TN build - we only had to load up the OS to start our evaluation process. Prior to that, we took some time to look into the BIOS interface. The video below presents the entire gamut of available options for the Tiger Canyon NUC.

Intel's mini-PCs have the most comprehensive and configurable UEFI / BIOS among all the ones that we have evaluated over the last several years. The Tiger Canyon NUC is no exception. The home screen shows the BIOS version, processor details, and installed memory capacity and speed right away - this is of great help in checking whether the installed SODIMMs are operating at the desired speeds. Under the 'Advanced' section, we have options to enable various SATA and M.2 NVMe ports, and disable the disk activity LED if needed. Different USB ports and headers can be selectively enabled or disabled. iSCSI volumes can be mounted in the boot stage, and the network settings can be configured for network boot when needed. The HDMI / DisplayPort audio can be disabled, if necessary. Thunderbolt support is also controllable via the BIOS, as are a bunch of other features.

One of the most useful features in the lineup of Intel NUCs targeting the professional / business use-cases is the display emulation option under 'Advanced > Video'. This is useful for scenarios involving headless operation and digital signage installations, as it allows set up of a virtual display when no display is connected (virtual display emulation), or makes the OS think that a previously connected display is still connected to the display output (persistent display emulation).

The 'Cooling' section provides an overview of current temperatures and fan speeds, and allows fine grained control of the fan operation - including the sensors to which it responds, and the temperatures at which different actions need to trigger. In the 'Performance' section, users can control hyperthreading support, selectively enable or disable cores, and control various performance options like Turbo Boos and SpeedStep. The memory timings can also be finely controlled. Various password options including TCG Opal configuration can be activated from the 'Security' section. Virtualization support and VT-d are also enabled or disabled from this section.

The 'Power' section allows users to optimize the system for balanced performance, or low power operation, or for maximum performance. In the last case, Intel's Dynamic Power Technology can also be configured for energy efficiency. Further customization is possible by allowing for different sustained and burst mode package power limits (PL1 and PL2), as well as the package power time window. Secondary power settings allow for configuration of LED behavior in different sleep states, as well as allowing support for waking up via different peripheral interfaces. PCIe ASPM support is also controllable from this section. The 'Boot' section allows configuration of secure boot, boot priorities, POST screen configuration, etc. A boot override option here is probably the only update we would like in the BIOS - a shortcut to rebooting and pressing F10 repeatedly in order to choose a temporary boot device.

Intel's documentation provides a block diagram for the Tiger Canyon NUC board. It gives insights into the distribution of high-speed I/O lanes.

The PCIe 4.0 x4 lanes servicing the M.2 NVMe SSD and the two Thunderbolt 4 ports are directly off the processor die. A single PCIe 3.0 x1 lane from the Tiger Point-LP PCH is used to connect the Intel I225-LM controller. The AX201 WLAN controller hooks up via the CNVi interface in the PCH. The front USB 3.2 Gen 2 ports are from the processor, while the USB 2.0 and USB 3.2 Gen 2 ports in the rear are from the PCH.

In addition to the comparison between the actively-cooled and passively-cooled versions of the NUC11TNBi5, we also consider some of the other passively cooled PCs reviewed earlier, as well as a few other recent UCFF systems. In the table below, we have an overview of the various systems that we are comparing.

Comparative PC Configurations
Aspect Intel NUC11TNBi5 (Akasa Newton TN)
CPU Intel Core i5-1135G7
Tiger Lake 4C/8T, 2.4 - 4.2 GHz
Intel 10nm SuperFin, 8MB L2, 28W
(PL1 = 28W, PL2 = 64W)
Intel Core i5-1135G7
Tiger Lake 4C/8T, 2.4 - 4.2 GHz
Intel 10nm SuperFin, 8MB L2, 28W
(PL1 = 28W, PL2 = 64W)
GPU Intel Iris Xe Graphics
(80EU @ 1.30 GHz)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
(80EU @ 1.30 GHz)
RAM Kingston 9905744-035.A00G DDR4-3200 SODIMM
22-22-22-52 @ 3200 MHz
2x16 GB
Kingston 9905744-035.A00G DDR4-3200 SODIMM
22-22-22-52 @ 3200 MHz
2x16 GB
Storage Samsung 980 PRO MZ-V8P500B/AM
(2500 GB; M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe;)
(1xxL V-NAND Gen 6 3D TLC; Samsung Elpis S4LV003 Controller)
Samsung 980 PRO MZ-V8P500B/AM
(2500 GB; M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe;)
(1xxL V-NAND Gen 6 3D TLC; Samsung Elpis S4LV003 Controller)
Wi-Fi 1x 2.5 GbE RJ-45 (Intel I225-LM)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (2x2 802.11ax - 2.4 Gbps)
1x 2.5 GbE RJ-45 (Intel I225-LM)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (2x2 802.11ax - 2.4 Gbps)
Price (in USD, when built) (Street Pricing on June 6th, 2022)
US $440 + $150 + $130 + $95 = $815 (as configured, no OS)
(Street Pricing on June 6th, 2022)
US $440 + $150 + $130 + $95 = $815 (as configured, no OS)

The NUC11TNKi5 and the NUC11TNBi5 (Akasa Newton TN) share the same configuration except for the pricing. The ASUS PN51-E1 slots in as a comparison point for what a mid-range Renoir can deliver (since we are comparing against a mid-range TGL-U part). It is a relevant comparison point for the NUC11TNKi5 from a price viewpoint, given they are both actively cooled. The ASUS PN50 and ASRock Industrial 4X4 BOX-4800U make up the high-end actively-cooled Renoir systems.

We also have results from a recent re-benchmarking session of the ASRock Industriall NUC BOX-1165G7. It uses the latest BIOS (P1.40), but modifies the default options to better reflect usage in a home / business scenario (ASRock Industrial stated that they had optimized the BIOS defaults for industrial deployment). 'Advanced > CPU Configuration > CPU Operation Mode' was changed from default 'Normal Mode' (PL1 = 28W / PL2 = 28W) to 'Performance Mode' (PL1 = 38W / PL2 = 55W), 'Advanced > CPU Configuration > CPU C-States Support' was changed from default 'Disabled' to 'Enabled', 'CPU C States Support > Enhanced Halt State (C1E)' set to 'Enabled', 'CPU C States Support > Package C State Support' set to 'Auto', and 'CPU C States Support > CFG Lock' left at 'Disabled'. 

The OnLogic HX500 is a representation for Intel's previous generation in a fanless avatar. Even though it utilizes a desktop CPU with a 35W TDP, it makes sense to include it in the comparisons as Tiger Lake-U includes fine-grained power management with boosts up to 64W to make it competitive against real desktop CPUs.

The Akasa Turing / Bean Canyon configuration is also included in the benchmarks to identify improvements that consumers can see for similarly priced systems when upgrading after a couple of generations. Results from a Core i5 Comet Lake-U system (the Minisforum UM850) are also included. Finally, we have Supermicro's SM-E100-12T-H - another TGL-U representation, albeit at a much lower package power limit.

Akasa Newton TN Noiseless NUC Build System Performance: UL and BAPCo Benchmarks
Comments Locked

18 Comments

View All Comments

  • deporter - Friday, July 22, 2022 - link

    Thanks for the review!
    Indeed, if you want to cool that kind of power without any throttling, you simply need a bigger mass of metal. Still, it's not so bad and probably good enough for most use cases.
  • deil - Monday, July 25, 2022 - link

    A little sad its throttling, it's very close to sustaining it while new and clean, it might become choppy and slow soon, when tiny amount of dust will get in. especially in SFF, I prefer machines that don't go beyond 80'C
  • yankeeDDL - Wednesday, July 27, 2022 - link

    I use a laprop with Tiger Lake as my daily driver for work. Company policy is Intel-only.
    It is a hot mess, drains the battery and it is definitely not zippy. I have a 4800HS at home that runs circles around it.
    74W at the wall. And it is half as fast as a 4800U in multithreaded apps. With TL Intel is not even in the same ballpark as AMD. Gen 12 seems a huge improvement. Perhaps Gen 13 will catch up.
  • ganeshts - Wednesday, July 27, 2022 - link

    I am curious from a benchmarking suite perspective - what are the multi-threaded apps that you are using? CPU-based rendering like Cinebench etc., obviously benefits - but no one is seriously going to use a TGL-U system for that purpose. I do see MT performance benefiting compression and decompression using 7-Zip. Anything else?
  • Calin - Thursday, July 28, 2022 - link

    Corporate computers run a _lot_ of software that is not present on home computers. Also, their startup sequence is more complex due to the integration into Active Directory (adding extra startup steps).
    Not to mention that you might have a transparent VPN installed that send data through the company network, which slows down otherwise fast "internet" actions.
    So, you're comparing apples and oranges.
  • TensorVortex - Friday, July 22, 2022 - link

    Yah there are some router on aliexpress with i5 or i7 11th gen fanless that cost the same or cheaper than this. I bought one and was running it at 70C fanless, and a filter cap blown, and the high side mosfet also burnt through… bought new mosfet, contacted support to get the spec of the filter cap, apparently they are using L5V rating caps, no wonder it blowns in a fanless case…. I have replaced the cap with X5R cap, and running a fan to cool it down now…
  • t.s - Friday, July 22, 2022 - link

    For box that small, > 70 watt is insane.
  • Ryan1981 - Saturday, July 23, 2022 - link

    I have an Intel NUC 8 Rugged Kit NUC8CCHKR, I've tried the Zotac CI331 Nano, both fanless but not "noiseless"! I wanted these as a bedroom HTPC that I can leave on in the night for smart home purposes and the convenience of not having to wait till it's booted and ready to go but I ended up having to turn it off because while there is no fan noise, the electrical noise coming from these PC's is audible at night and disrupting my sleep. No major issue for me since it was a test but when I see this article claiming it is noiseless, I strongly suspect it is in fact not, and I'd feel it should be included in the testing. In fact I'd feel this is an underestimated topic to have bedroom appliances like clocks, phone chargers and nowadays smart lights etc. that do not make some form of electrical noise (speficially high pitched ones).
  • ganeshts - Saturday, July 23, 2022 - link

    I have observed the issue in a couple of fanless mini-PCs.. like the one reviewed here:

    https://www.anandtech.com/show/14157/zotac-zbox-ci...

    I had observed this issue in some of the fanless Zotac PCs I had reviewed back in 2016 too. I think the problem actually may vary from sample to sample - I also reviewed the CI662 nano with pretty much the same board, but just a newer CPU - and that didn't have the problem.

    It has probably got to do with some particular board component choice.

    I am surprised about the Chaco Canyon, though. Usually, Intel's board components are top-notch.
  • abufrejoval - Saturday, July 23, 2022 - link

    I got tons of equipment in the room where I also sleep.

    And I remember being bothered by a high pitched noise when things quietened down at night, that was hard to pinpoint. I tried using a spectroscope app on the smartphone to identify where the high pitch was coming from, too. I wound up really ripping out everything connected to the power lines, but no luck.

    Eventually it dawned on me that I have tinnitus...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now