For better or worse, this decade has marked an explosion of mobile-related lawsuits and anti-trust actions across the globe. Now, that trend is reaching what may be its apex, with Qualcomm filing a countersuit against their increasingly distant customer, Apple.

This latest suit comes in response to Apple taking action against Qualcomm earlier this year in multiple forms. At the regulatory level, Apple has been levying complaints against Qualcomm for some time, providing evidence and testimony that is being used in anti-trust suits against Qualcomm, particularly the most-recent suit by the US FTC in January of this year. The crux of the regulatory suits has been over Qualcomm’s patent and technology licensing business, and whether the company was refusing to follow FRAND policies while charging unreasonably high royalties. Meanwhile at the business level, in the same month Apple also sued Qualcomm directly over many of the same issues, along with accusing the company of withholding a billion dollars in rebates.

Qualcomm’s countersuit, which was all but expected, forms the backbone of the company’s response to Apple’s own suit and involvement in regulatory actions. In a short press release, the company noted that they intend to “vigorously defend” their business model, while laying out a case for why they believe Apple is in the wrong and why Apple should owe them damages.

A big part of Qualcomm’s countersuit, unsurprisingly, is focused around Apple’s hand in various regulatory suits, accusing the company of “misrepresenting facts and making false statements.” Qualcomm is also accusing Apple of generally mischaracterizing their business interactions with Qualcomm, and interfering with Qualcomm’s business relationships with the third-party firms that actually manufacture Apple’s iOS devices. All told, Qualcomm is accusing Apple of taking several steps to force them to agree to lower licensing rates, and that in doing so Apple violated FRAND principles.

However the most interesting points from Qualcomm’s countersuit involves the iPhone 7, which is the first phone from Apple in several years to offer models without a Qualcomm modem. Here, Qualcomm is specifically accusing Apple of not utilizing the full performance of the Qualcomm modems in those models, while also threatening Qualcomm to prevent them from publicly touting the performance of the Qualcomm-powered models.

Both of these points are almost certainly related to Apple’s configuration choices with the various iPhone 7 models. While the Snapdragon X12 used in the Qualcomm-powered iPhones is capable of LTE Category 12 features, the Intel XMM 7360 modem used in the other models is only capable of LTE Category 10. Presumably to ensure the phones’ abilities were consistent, Apple opted not to enable many Cat 12 features on the Qualcomm models, such as 4x4 MIMO and 256-QAM, essentially limiting it to the same 450Mbps down speed as the Intel models.

In any case, at this point the gloves have come off and Qualcomm is not holding back on their increasingly distant customer. Qualcomm’s countersuit isn’t asking for any specific compensation at this time, but the company is looking to be awarded both compensatory and punitive damages from Apple. And with two of the biggest technology companies in the US now locked into mutual legal combat, it’s likely that this series of lawsuits will go the distance.

Source: Qualcomm

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • Socius - Monday, April 17, 2017 - link

    Apple only used those patents against a company that literally stole its designs by trying to make as much of an iPhone clone as possible. Samsung and HTC. In general, it's very common for asian countries to simply look at a product, and make something that borrows enough visual cues from it that it looks familiar/similar to the average consumer.

    Patents, just like laws in general, can definitely be abused. However, they do exist for a good reason. And Samsung needs to burn in hell.
  • amosbatto - Sunday, October 15, 2017 - link

    Just like Apple copied a cell phone made by Sony to make the first iPhone. Apple even hired some of the Sony engineers when making the first iPhone. A lawsuit over rounded corners is ridiculous and shows the utter brokenness of the patent system. As a computer programmer, I can tell you that most software patents are bullshit. The idiots in the patent office granted a patent in 2006 for a linked list, which is the most common form of data structure after an array and has been used by programmers since the early 1960s.
  • Socius - Monday, April 17, 2017 - link

    I'm not sure you understand what a "patent troll" is. You just seem to have a problem with the idea of patents in general. Which is idiotic.
  • vladx - Tuesday, April 11, 2017 - link

    Yep, Apple and Qualcomm destroying each other would do everyone a big favor.
  • xype - Tuesday, April 11, 2017 - link

    The funny part would be, when either went bust, an actual patent troll swiping in to collecting their IP.
  • Chaitanya - Tuesday, April 11, 2017 - link

    Pretty sure it will be Samsung vs Intel who will be swooping over this like vultures to collect IP.
  • Sarah Terra - Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - link

    Apple is going to sink itself to be honest, it will take a good long while but it is only a matter of time now before they are knocked off the throne, honestly IM going to predect amazon starting to make more waves. You laugh, but bezos is into everything, from space travel to the grocery market, autmoated factories, watch. He's coming after google Apple and everyone esle, and amazons revenue stream is extremely diversified. One trick pony Apple is it very high risk.
  • Samus - Tuesday, April 11, 2017 - link

    Apple isn't a patent troll. They just don't like it when they copy something then someone copies them back.
  • Sarah Terra - Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - link

    Alright, lets be more precise apple is a patent bully, i suppose troll is a firm that only sues over patents, but apple actively seeks rediculous patents and uses them to sink competitors. Diarrhea or really doesnt matter either way as you are still dealing with a lot of poop.
  • cocochanel - Tuesday, April 11, 2017 - link


Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now