AMD G-Series Brings APUs to the x86 Embedded Marketby Ganesh T S on January 19, 2011 12:29 AM EST
The AMD Embedded G-Series platform being introduced tonight is the world's first Accelerated Processing Unit (APU) for embedded systems. AMD has had quite a bit of history of supporting x86 based embedded systems. Starting with the Geode processor in 2003 (obtained from National Semiconductors and used in the OLPC project), AMD went on to introduce AMD64 technology into the embedded markets with the AMD Opteron processors in 2005. In 2007, the addition of graphics and other chipset options by AMD enabled comprehensive embedded solutions. In 2009, AMD introduced BGA (Ball Grid Array) packaging to meet customer demand.
At CES 2011, they gave us a sneak peek into the Embedded G-Series platform based on Brazos. AMD has increased performance and features in every generation while bringing down the power, area and price barriers for x86 in the embedded market.
The embedded market space is dominated by SoCs based on RISC processors such as ARM and MIPS. For most power sensitive embedded applications, PowerPC and x86 based solutions do not make the cut. x86, in particular, has been the dark horse due to the excessive power consumption for systems based on that architecture. Process shrinks have helped lower the power consumption numbers. However, we are still a few nodes away from when the x86 based solutions can really compete with RISC based solutions on the power front.
In the meantime, solutions like what we are seeing from AMD today integrate premium graphics capabilities within power envelops similar to what x86 used to consume in the previous generation—so you get CPU+GPU instead of just a CPU. RISC based embedded solutions may still be winning on the power front; however, for applications where slightly higher power consumption is not a concern, the x86 threat from the AMD embedded G-Series platform can become a cause for concern. MIPS is usually popular in such applications (set top boxes, digital signage etc.) and they will be facing credible opposition with AMD's integrated graphics capabilities.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
Shadowmaster625 - Thursday, January 20, 2011 - linkhttp://grab.by/8tvw
I'm not an artist but I just couldnt resist pitting a bulldozer against a "sandy bridge". What kind of dumb name is a sandy bridge anyway?
AMDer - Saturday, January 22, 2011 - linkHiya
I work in AMD and truthfully the commitment and enthusiasm is great in bringing out world class products.. Thanks for the wonderful APUs my dear AMD
hd10 - Saturday, January 22, 2011 - linkintel leads the x86 architectures and sales. And if AMD keep on thinking out of box like this one, so it might put a challenge for intel and then where dramas start. And of course creativity and technology bloom.
0ldman - Monday, January 24, 2011 - linkIsn't your name the same as the download file for Sisoft Sandra benchmark from like 7 years ago?
You can't come up with anything but fanboy drivel or an original forum name?
Sam125 - Monday, January 24, 2011 - linkI wonder what took so long for AMD to get into the embedded market as trying to compete with Intel on x86 front seemed kind of foolhardy. Well anyway, go AMD!
pandemonium - Tuesday, February 1, 2011 - linkAs much as custom PC builders hate to admit that APUs will be the next great thing, playback of 1080p content doesn't really take much GPU power. Not until deep color ranges (32bit+) become popular will it make a difference. Besides, a small chipset that's fully capable of accelerated displays and computational procedures as well is already being used by several devices on the market and will continue to grow rapidly with handhelds (IE: smartphones) finally becoming mainstream.
AMD is making the right decision here, albeit late. :P