While I was scheduling my Mobile World Congress meetings I got an email request from Intel. It wanted to give me a quick tour of the latest MeeGo UI for tablets. MeeGo, as you may remember, was the combination of Intel's Moblin OS and Nokia's own efforts. While MeeGo isn't completely abandoned by Nokia, it's looking unlikely that Nokia will be a major player in it going forward considering the fresh partnership with Microsoft.

Intel is still trucking away with MeeGo and unfortunately appears to be retaining the less-than-ideal name despite the recent shakeup with its partner (at least Moblin sounded respectable, MeeGo sounds like something you say before using the bathroom).

MeeGo is designed to be a mobile OS that can be used across a wide variety of devices. Cars, netbooks, smartphones, tablets and even TVs are supposed to be built around the totally open OS. Intel hopes that MeeGo will be the truly open alternative to Android. It's a lofty goal to say the least. Google officially introduced Android 3.0 earlier in the month and devices based on it are expected to be shipping in the next couple of months. The version of MeeGo Intel demoed for me however is a meager 1.2. While I know that comparing version numbers isn't the most scientific thing in the world, it's the easiest way for me to point out that MeeGo is no where near the maturity level of Android.

The point of today's demo was to showcase the foundation of MeeGo's tablet user experience. Intel's focus here is multitasking. What Intel wants to do away with is the concept of going back to an app launcher to do something else with your tablet. Instead, Intel believes you should be able to launch apps based on what you're doing. It's a subtle difference, but one that's best described by a screenshot.

This is the MeeGo tablet user experience. The screen is treated as a viewport into an infinitely wide and infinitely tall desktop. You scroll from left to right to view more panels, and up/down to view more information within a panel.

Each panel is grouped according to an overall function. The My Tablet panel includes your top applications as well as device settings for when you absolutely need to do something the old fashioned way. The Friends panel aggregates all of your communications between you and your friends. This could be in the form of tweets, Facebook status updates as well as emails and other messages. Everything appears in this one view. If you tap on any of the items in the view, the associated application will launch (e.g. tap an email you received from one of your friends to fire up the email app).

There are also panels for music, photos and websites.

Intel believes that launching applications to later access data with them is silly and you should instead be presented with the data you want and it should launch any necessary application for you. It's a shift from the app centric model of today's smartphone/tablet OSes to a data centric model. Intel feels that this approach will reduce the number of taps necessary to efficiently multitask, which will obviously encourage heavier usage models and ultimately require faster SoCs to run everything.

If the infinitely wide/tall viewport sounds a lot like Microsoft's Windows Phone 7 UI then you're not alone. The concept seems very similar, although it's not nearly as pretty/polished in MeeGo today. For not supporting full blown multitasking out of the box, Microsoft's WP7 UI is very efficient at moving between apps. If MeeGo can duplicate that efficiency and expand upon it, I'm interested.


Microsoft's Metro UI

The bigger issue I see with MeeGo is the huge disconnect between Intel's aspirations and the current state of affairs. If Android is the target, MeeGo needs to make a great deal of progress in a relatively short period of time. These consumer facing smartphone/tablet OSes have to be ridiculously polished, they need to make mechanical toasters look difficult to use, and MeeGo just isn't there yet.


MeeGo currently supports Swype

I like the concept. A truly open OS that allows for infinite customization and supports everything from smartphones and tablets to PCs and TVs. We need unification. The last thing I want is to have a HP tablet that can't run the same apps as my iOS smartphone and my Google TV. Unfortunately for Intel I feel like the deck is stacked against it on this. Intel does an amazing job executing on its microprocessor designs, but its extra curricular activities are rarely met with a similar amount of success.

I'm all for more competition so let's see where MeeGo takes us over the coming years.

POST A COMMENT

15 Comments

View All Comments

  • name99 - Monday, February 14, 2011 - link

    "Intel believes that launching applications to later access data with them is silly and you should instead be presented with the data you want and it should launch any necessary application for you. It's a shift from the app centric model of today's smartphone/tablet OSes to a data centric model."

    Apple couldn't make this fly with OpenDoc and Publish/Subscribe.
    MS poured vastly more money and effort into OLE, to no avail.
    I'd say these two efforts show that, regardless of what marketers or ubernerds might feel, people today are perfectly happy with "application centric computing", and that, when presented with data centric computing they've been not much interested.

    I don't have a religious view on this. I don't really understand why both OpenDoc and OLE failed. It just seems to me that there's a whole lot of history being ignored here.

    Of course what Intel MIGHT mean is something substantially weaker than the claim they seem to be making. On OSX (and I assume Windows) while browsing my data files, I can simply double click on them to launch the relevant app --- nothing new there, nothing new there since at least 1984.
    A stronger version of this claim would be something like "files are not user visible, only 'data'". In that case you have something like iOS, where Apple has likewise tried to make files not a visible part of the UI. And Apple has not (IMHO) had great success with this. In simple situations it works OK, but it falls apart as soon as users become more ambitious. An obvious example of this on iOS is the problem of PDFs, where you might have a dozen different apps, each with their own data store which includes PDFs, and no way to read a PDF in one app from another app.
    I suspect that Apple, over the next few years is going to have to back down in some way or another from this "files are invisible (and siloed)" attitude. And I find it unlikely that Intel can come up with a set of UI paradigms that solves this problem where Apple could not.
    Reply
  • Azethoth - Monday, February 14, 2011 - link

    True story! I get a voicemail and it puts a red number on my phone app. I click on this bit of data and voila, my phone app launches. Same with mail and text!

    Seriously though, what does a voicemail look like in its raw state before I click on it to launch an app to view it?
    Reply
  • Munnin - Saturday, February 26, 2011 - link

    I realize it is rough, but they DO need to play catch up. I'm thinking they may have missed the bus, and are probably hosed after Nokia dumped MeeGo.

    My break-down as I see it:

    WP7:
    Pretty but not open. I can't comment on the usability aspects.

    Android:
    Meh in the default looks department, but open and customizable to fit the user's tastes and workflow. UI is coming along though and constantly refined.

    iOS:
    Apple really has always been UI centric. They have been anal-retentive about their UIs and User-experiences to the point of being dogmatic in it's closed approach.

    If they intend to compete with these three OSes then I think they need to spend time on a Delorian project and go "Back to the Future". I'm glad someone is pointing to a unified architecture for multiple hardware platforms, but in the end they should have said something and done something sooner to be taken seriously. I'm on the they should stick to what they know which is chips and hardware.
    Reply
  • (ppshopping) - Wednesday, March 2, 2011 - link

    welcome Reply
  • lili53 - Friday, March 11, 2011 - link

    welcome Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now