After this morning's Apple event, I've been a constant state of motion. I had the opportunity to finish the iPhone 5 hands on, but there were three other devices of note from today's Apple announcement. The first is the new iPod Touch 5th Gen, next is the iPod Nano 7th Gen, and finally there are Apple's new stock earbuds which they've dubbed EarPods. 

iPod Touch 5th Gen

Though we were a bit conservative with our iPhone 5 silicon predictions and ended up being off the mark by fingering A5R2 as the most likely candidate, what does get an A5 or A5-derivative SoC is the iPod Touch 5th Gen. This is most likely again the 32nm HK-MG SoC we've seen in the iPad2,4 and Apple TV 3rd Generation. The iPod Touch 5th gen gets a suite of improvements in this refresh, including the same 720p front facing camera as the iPhone 5, and for the first time a decent rear facing camera. The rear facing camera is a combination of the new optical system from the iPhone 5 and a 5 MP CMOS sensor which likely is the same as what was in the iPhone 4. 

What's really great about the 5th Gen iPod Touch is its construction. The entire device is a single piece of anodized aluminum, and save a small plastic cutout at the top which serves as an RF window for 2.4 and 5 GHz WiFi and Bluetooth, it's an unbroken aluminum shell. The device is also very thin, and feels great in the hand. The only unfortunate bit is that the rear facing camera sticks out of the assembly by about a good 1 mm or so, which seems odd. The new iPod Touch will come in a suite of colors, though interestingly enough the front glass plate color is white on every model Update: except the black model, whose front glass is black (Thanks everyone!). 

At the bottom left is a new pop out loop for adding a hand strap, and each iPod Touch will bundle a matching color strap in the box. The circular mount clicks into place, leaving the backside flush if users opt to not use the strap. 

In addition, the iPod Touch 5th gen uses the same exact display and display assembly as the iPhone 5. That includes the nearly 100% sRGB coverage, in-cell touch, and 1136x640 resolution. Apple is clearly leveraging an economy of scale between the iPhone 5 and this generation of iPod to make that display affordable. 

The new iPod Touch also includes the same dual band (2.4 and 5 GHz) single spatial stream WiFi with support for 40MHz channels on 5 GHz. This is no doubt the same BCM4334 as in the iPhone 5. The new iPod Touch also includes support for the new Lightning dock port.

For Apple, refreshing the iPod Touch with newer silicon is important to keep as close to parity with the highest end development target as possible. The previous iPod Touch was starting to get a bit old with the A4 SoC, and moving to the 32nm version of the A5 has helped things a lot. While playing around with the iPod Touch 5th Gen I didn't find the interface laggy at all, though in taxing things like Maps with 3D buildings it was different from the iPhone 5.

iPod Nano 7th Generation

If there's one product in Apple's lineup that has seen constant change and design revisions, it's the iPod Nano, and the 7th generation is no exception. This revision is dramatically changed from the previous generation, and includes a 240x432 resolution 16:9 display with support for video playback. In addition, the display includes full multi-touch support for zooming into stored photos.

The new iPod Nano also includes Bluetooth with support for A2DP, which is a welcome addition considering the number of A2DP headsets popping up or use with a car stereo. There's also FM with support for pausing and resuming playback, so there's clearly some local buffering being done. 

The device is also completely anodized aluminum save a small RF window at the very bottom, and like the iPod Touch will come in a variety of colors. The iPod Nano comes in only one storage configuration at 16 GB. 


The third Music-related refresh we saw today were Apple's new bundled earbuds, which they've named EarPods. These will ship with all of the refreshed iDevices in place of the previous generation of earbuds. Apple claims it has 3D scanned and computationally analyzed many ears to determine the optimal size and form factor for this new generation, and the new earbuds have a total of four apertures for producing sound. Interestingly enough there seems to be something to this, as covering an outside aperture with my finger does change sound noticeably.

The new EarPods also include the standard microphone and volume / select button controller on the right earpiece cord. Functionally, the EarPods are identical to the previous generation of earbuds, all that's different is improved acoustical performance and a computationally optimized fit for more of the population.

On the way to the demo room, all press was handed a set of EarPods, and they're also on sale now for $29.00 if you're dying to give them a shot. I tried the EarPods in place of my normal in-ears on my flight back, during time spent waiting in the terminal, and after I got home. Turns out they're surprisingly decent.

In the past I pretty much completely disregarded the supplied earphones bundled with iDevices, outside of their occasional utility thanks to the in-line microphone for long conference calls where holding the phone to your face gets fatiguing. I whipped out a pair of the previous generation bundled earbuds and compared a few songs, and the new earbuds indeed fit more comfortably in my ear canal and have noticeably better mids and bass. The previous generation sounds comparatively lifeless and tinny, whereas the new EarPods have a notably richer sound. It still isn't what I've come to expect from my in-ears, and isolation isn't a whole lot better, but for stock kit they're not bad at all. The supplied microphone also works well. 

In-ear fit is much more comfortable, as the previous generation's completely circular shape was like shoving a round peg in the idiomatic square hole that is my ear canal. The new ones as of a few hours of wearing haven't caused the same fatigue as I remember the originals resulting in. 


Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • JesseKramer - Thursday, September 13, 2012 - link

    Is it just me or do these new iPods look a little bit Sony-esque? Especially the Nano.
  • JesseKramer - Thursday, September 13, 2012 - link

    Maybe even a hint of Nokia Lumia.
  • Leonick - Thursday, September 13, 2012 - link

    Of course, the 800 and 900 Lumias has a strong hint of iPod Mini and second generation iPod Nano anyway...
  • irontom - Thursday, September 13, 2012 - link

    Hint? I am waiting for a lawsuit :>
  • tipoo - Thursday, September 13, 2012 - link

    Their website says they sound like headphones that cost "hundreds more". Good to know the baseline is improving, but that's a very fallacious claim then.
  • UsernameAlreadyExists - Friday, September 14, 2012 - link

    "The audio quality is so superior, they rival high-end headphones that cost hundreds of pounds more."

    I was wondering the same yesterday evening. If 200 is the lowest amount of pounds to fit in hundreds, those pods should be a match for over $300 earphones. ($360 to be unnecessarily specific ^.^)
  • aliasfox - Thursday, September 13, 2012 - link

    Any clue if the iPod Touch is the exact same one as in the iPad 2,4 or if it's the same one in the current generation AppleTV? IIRC, the AppleTV uses a die harvested single core variant with half the memory bandwidth. Not an issue for an AppleTV which doesn't have the same interaction as an in-hand iOS device (so the user won't necessarily notice if it's slower), but this solution would make the iPod Touch only slightly faster than the version with the A4.

    It would be nice if the iPod nano could be set to auto-record FM. I could set it to record NPR everyday from 4-6pm, for example (I don't think All Things Considered is available as a podcast). I'm sure someone decided to keep the recording studios happy by not including this feature though.
  • ThreeDee912 - Thursday, September 13, 2012 - link

    Well, Apple's site is already updated with all the new iPods and whatnot, and the "Features" section says "Dual-core A5 chip. Power meets play. It’s the most powerful iPod touch ever. That’s because the dual-core A5 chip provides up to twice the processing power and up to seven times faster graphics than the previous generation."
  • ciparis - Thursday, September 13, 2012 - link

    Shouldn't that be ears on?

  • NobleKain - Thursday, September 13, 2012 - link

    I'm not a "gym guy", but there's very little doubt that the target demographic for the Nano are gym-goers (and those who generally like physically active activities).

    I believe there's a perfect market for this device, and as such, while it doesn't appeal to me personally - I understand the decision to make the nano.

    The 7 includes bluetooth, which is fantastic. What surprises me is this: The target market who buy the Nano are also still just as likely to own an iPhone as someone without a Nano, due to its purpose. Why not make it an iPhone "extender" via Bluetooth?

    The Practical application is this: You're on a treadmill in the gym, and you own an iPhone and Nano. You own the Nano, because the iPhone in your pocket is a little too big while running. Why not allow the Nano to connect to the iPhone sitting in your backpack on the floor (via Bluetooth), and if a call comes in, you can answer it without getting your phone via your Nano, using the new EarPods with inline mic connected to the Nano?

    It seems like such a simple application, and makes the Nano decision for iPhone owners even less of a redundancy question.

    Anyway, the Nano isn't for me with or without this feature... but as an individual interesting in product design, its strikes me as low hanging fruit that was missed.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now