One of GIGABYTE's first B360 series motherboards in the Gaming 3 WIFI. This is our first review of this new chipset, and it offers users a cheaper way into the 8th generation Intel processors. The GIGABYTE B360 Gaming 3 WIFI includes many of the features found in the Z370 version, and even trumps it in one respect with its ultra-fast Intel CNVi Wi-Fi with speeds up to 1.73 Gbps.

AnandTech Intel 300-Series Motherboard and CPU Coverage

The GIGABYTE B360 Gaming 3 WIFI

When the Z370 chipset came to the market, it was not enough to satisfy all potential buyers. As with every platform, Intel released (although this time several months later) a second wave of cheaper chipsets, allowing buyers to purchase inexpensive motherboards for the latest processors. These motherboards are not always for the enthusiasts, but will allow users to enter the platform at a lower price. To that end, all board partners have several boards in the H370, B350, and H310 chipsets to choose from. 

The GIGABYTE B360 AORUS Gaming 3 WIFI in our hands today offers users that lower-cost of entry along with quite a few features. At $120, about the only thing missing from a base Z370 board the Gaming 3 Wi-Fi is the ability to overclock. The board includes lightning fast Wi-Fi capabilities (to 1.73 Gbps) as well as USB 3.1 (10 Gbps) support integrated into the chipset. Many in this market are simply looking for basic features and a pleasing design aesthetic. While it may not have some of the extended shrouding visuals we see higher up the stack, its clear appearance and brushed aluminum heatsinks with orange accents work well for an overall neat system. There's also some RGB LED lighting around the board.

It takes more than good looks and a solid feature set to entice buyers into purchasing a board, as performance counts even with a locked system. We ran the board through our testing suite to see if the system shines under the hood as well. 

Overall, the performance testing went without a hitch. Despite most Z370 boards implementing some 'beyond stock' performance, often called Multi-Core Enhancement (MCE), the B360 Gaming 3 WIFI was within striking distance of those that did not use MCE. Where the Gaming 3 WIFI really shined was in the power consumption testing. Compared to the other motherboards we have tested, it consumed around 20W less than the others.

Regarding other features, the board comes fully equipped with support for two memory modules per channel with total support up to 64 GB and speeds up to DDR4 2666 (memory overclocking is not possible here). For storage connectivity, we see both of the common options of SATA ports as well as dual M.2 slots. The board has a total of six SATA3 ports and unlike its Z370 brothers, the B360 chipset does not support any kind of RAID. Users will have to add that through add-in cards or external solutions. The dual M.2 slots support both PCIe and SATA drives, though it is worth it to note the second slot (at the bottom of the case) only supports PCIe x2 bandwidth. The board does support AMD Crossfire setups across the PCIe lanes through the chipset, but not NVIDIA SLI due to lane burification limits on the platform. 

For connectivity, the back panel IO gives users a total of four USB 2.0 ports, three USB 3.0 ports (one Type-C), and one USB 3.1 (10 Gbps) port (red Type-A). We can also see the DVI-D and HDMI outputs for video, the Intel Gigabit LAN port, as well as a six-plug audio stack and a legacy PS/2 mouse/keyboard port. Perhaps the only thing missing is a SPDIF output. 

Pricing on the AORUS B360 Gaming 3 WIFI is currently $120 on The board's direct competition from a price perspective is the ASRock B360 Gaming K4 ($118), ASUS ROG Strix B360-H Gaming ($115), and an MSI B360 Gaming Arctic ($125). Less than $10 separates these boards from each other price wise, with the main differences found in the number of SATA ports, the number of M.2 slots, the number of PCIe x1 slots, and audio/network controllers. GIGABYTE has brought forth a solid board with a lot of features at a reasonable price with which to build a system around.

What Comes with B360

In the past, the cheaper chipsets were usually cut down versions of the main high-end chipset. This is no longer the case. The B360 chipset has native USB 3.1 (10 Gbps) support, unlike Z370, which allows motherboard partners to no longer need third-party USB 3.1 controllers to bring the high-speed connectivity, lowering the overall cost.

Another significant change is in wireless networking. Normally, Intel wireless adapters and their RF elements are on a single module that fits into a standard M.2 E-key slot. These chipsets are the first in the mainstream desktop to use Intel's integrated connectivity (through CNVi technology) for wireless networking. This moves the control functions of the Wi-Fi modules into the chipset. The only thing board partners need to do is add a compatible companion RF front-end module, which is cheaper (but still adds about $15 cost to the final price). The fastest versions of these will allow for speeds up to 1.73 Gbps from the Wireless-AC 9560 CRF module, as found on the Gaming 3 WIFI. This is possible through the Wave 2 features such as 160 MHz channel widths and MU-MIMO. 

On the downsides with B360 is the inability to overclock either the CPU or DRAM, with the memory limited to DDR4-2666. B360 motherboards are also not RAID capable.

GIGABYTE B360 Strategy

GIGABYTE has over a dozen motherboards for the B360 chipset, some of which are currently available at Newegg and Amazon.

GIGABYTE's B360 Motherboard Lineup (4/16)
Amazon Newegg
B360 Gaming 3 WIFI this review $120 $119
B360 Gaming 3   - -
B360 HD3P   - -
B360 HD3   $85 -
B360M Gaming 3   - -
B360M D3H   $100 ^ $79
B360M DS3H   $68 $68
B360M HD3   $85 -
B360M D3V   - -
B360M D2V   - -
B360M D3P   - -
B360M Gaming HD   - -
B360M H   - -
B360N Gaming WIFI   - -
B360N WIFI   - -

^ Third Party Seller

Information on Intel's Coffee-Lake CPU Desktop Processors

One important piece of information to note: technically these processors use the LGA1151 socket, also used by 6th and 7th Generation processors using the Z170 and Z270 chipsets. But due to several (albeit minor) difference in the pin-layout of these two sets of processors, the 8th Generation Coffee Lake will only work in Z370 boards and are not cross compatible. Back in October 2017, Ian Cutress reviewed a couple of processors (i7-8700K and i7-8400) in the Coffee Lake lineup - details on the rest of the product stack are listed below.


The GIGABYTE B360 Gaming 3 WIFI Review

In this review, we have the following pages:

  1. Overview
  2. Visual Inspection
  3. BIOS and Software
  4. Board Features
  5. System Performance
  6. CPU Performance
  7. Gaming Performance
  8. Conclusions
Visual Inspection
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • drw28 - Wednesday, July 11, 2018 - link

    can you review the gigabyte UD pro drives?the combination of phison s10 and toshiba's bics nand would be interesting to see.
  • peevee - Wednesday, July 11, 2018 - link

    There used to be you could get a decent ATX MB for the latest mainstream CPU for around $50. What happened? Is it Intel overpricing their chipsets?
  • imaheadcase - Wednesday, July 11, 2018 - link

    In what world did you visit to get that cheap..i think you are mistaken.
  • DanNeely - Wednesday, July 11, 2018 - link

    In aggressive sales perhaps. Otherwise, while I recall seeing an occasional $50 board; the reviews always indicated that there was something wrong with them. Either from a company known to only build garbage (eg PC Chips, ECS before they figured out how to make good products, or a few other companies who're dead and forgotten) or an occasional screwed up board from a mainstream brand. I remember getting an ASUS S939 board for maybe $60 years ago, when it crapped out and I looked at reviews I turned out that I wasn't alone, something like 50% 1/2 stars from people whose boards had died on them.
  • The True Morbus - Thursday, July 12, 2018 - link

    I think there used to a PERCEPTION that you could get a decent board for 50 bucks, but that's probably because most 150$ boards looked similar to most 50$ boards.
    You can still buy the 50$ boards if you want. They'll be the first thing to give out in the build, you can write that down. And no, it doesn't matter if they're from a famous brand, they'll likely give out even quicker if that's the case.
  • PeachNCream - Thursday, July 12, 2018 - link

    The last $50 motherboard I purchased was a Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2 which was a FM2 socket mATX board. The SATA connectors all failed at the same time about three months after I bought it. There was a DVD drive on one and a 1TB WD hard drive on another when it gave up and stopped detecting devices. I tried a few other drives, shuffled ports around, got new cables, etc and the hard drive worked in an external case just fine (still is working in fact). It wasn't worth the trouble to go through customer support for RMA, but it was a bit annoying. That was the last time I wasted effort on a desktop of any sort and PC games for the most part as well. Glad to be done with that particular disaster after multiple decades of chasing system requirements. Cell phone gaming FTW!
  • peevee - Thursday, July 12, 2018 - link

    My last personal builds were in 2000 (on ASUS) and 2011 (ASRock). Never failed. Maybe they were 50-something.
  • peevee - Thursday, July 12, 2018 - link

    The latter is the Z68 board I still use. With then brand-new top-of-the-consumer-line i7-2600k.
    Still OCZ Vertex 3 256GB bought for $500 then, still works (although until they have fixed its firmware about a year later it had troubles). Now THAT one still alive is a surprise.
  • Galcobar - Wednesday, July 11, 2018 - link

    Some copy editing might be in order. Aside from the raft of grammatical errors (e.g. worth vs worthy of), random commas and typos (e.g. B350, i7-8400), specifications are contradictory.

    For example, page 1: "... a total [of] four USB 2.0 ports, three USB 3.0 ports (one Type-C), and one USB 3.1 (10 Gbps) port (red Type-A)."

    Page 2: "USB 2.0 (4x ports), USB 3.0 (3x ports) and a USB 3.1 Type-C port"

    Also, when did Anandtech switch (back) to referring to USB 3.1 Gen 1 and Gen 2 as, respectively, USB 3.0 and 3.1? Five days ago it was the former.
  • Joe Shields - Wednesday, July 11, 2018 - link

    The typo mentioned RE: USB was corrected. Thank you for catching that.

    As far as the 'switch'.... I know in my reviews, at least the past dozen or two, I have been referring to it in this manner consistently AFAIK. Prior to that I would use something like "USB 3.1 (speed here)" to clarify.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now