The Arctic Cooling Liquid Freezer II 240 & 420 AIO Coolers Review: Big and Effectiveby E. Fylladitakis on January 15, 2021 8:15 AM EST
- Posted in
- Water Cooling
- Liquid Cooling
Although the testing of a cooler appears to be a simple task, that could not be much further from the truth. Proper thermal testing cannot be performed with a cooler mounted on a single chip, for multiple reasons. Some of these reasons include the instability of the thermal load and the inability to fully control and or monitor it, as well as the inaccuracy of the chip-integrated sensors. It is also impossible to compare results taken on different chips, let alone entirely different systems, which is a great problem when testing computer coolers, as the hardware changes every several months. Finally, testing a cooler on a typical system prevents the tester from assessing the most vital characteristic of a cooler, its absolute thermal resistance.
The absolute thermal resistance defines the absolute performance of a heatsink by indicating the temperature rise per unit of power, in our case in degrees Celsius per Watt (°C/W). In layman's terms, if the thermal resistance of a heatsink is known, the user can assess the highest possible temperature rise of a chip over ambient by simply multiplying the maximum thermal design power (TDP) rating of the chip with it. Extracting the absolute thermal resistance of a cooler however is no simple task, as the load has to be perfectly even, steady and variable, as the thermal resistance also varies depending on the magnitude of the thermal load. Therefore, even if it would be possible to assess the thermal resistance of a cooler while it is mounted on a working chip, it would not suffice, as a large change of the thermal load can yield much different results.
Appropriate thermal testing requires the creation of a proper testing station and the use of laboratory-grade equipment. Therefore, we created a thermal testing platform with a fully controllable thermal energy source that may be used to test any kind of cooler, regardless of its design and or compatibility. The thermal cartridge inside the core of our testing station can have its power adjusted between 60 W and 340 W, in 2 W increments (and it never throttles). Furthermore, monitoring and logging of the testing process via software minimizes the possibility of human errors during testing. A multifunction data acquisition module (DAQ) is responsible for the automatic or the manual control of the testing equipment, the acquisition of the ambient and the in-core temperatures via PT100 sensors, the logging of the test results and the mathematical extraction of performance figures.
Finally, as noise measurements are a bit tricky, their measurement is being performed manually. Fans can have significant variations in speed from their rated values, thus their actual speed during the thermal testing is being recorded via a laser tachometer. The fans (and pumps, when applicable) are being powered via an adjustable, fanless desktop DC power supply and noise measurements are being taken 1 meter away from the cooler, in a straight line ahead from its fan engine. At this point we should also note that the Decibel scale is logarithmic, which means that roughly every 3 dB(A) the sound pressure doubles. Therefore, the difference of sound pressure between 30 dB(A) and 60 dB(A) is not "twice as much" but nearly a thousand times greater. The table below should help you cross-reference our test results with real-life situations.
The noise floor of our recording equipment is 30.2-30.4 dB(A), which represents a medium-sized room without any active noise sources. All of our acoustic testing takes place during night hours, minimizing the possibility of external disruptions.
|35-38dB(A)||Very quiet (whisper-slight humming)|
|38-40dB(A)||Quiet (relatively comfortable - humming)|
|40-44dB(A)||Normal (humming noise, above comfortable for a large % of users)|
|44-47dB(A)*||Loud* (strong aerodynamic noise)|
|47-50dB(A)||Very loud (strong whining noise)|
|50-54dB(A)||Extremely loud (painfully distracting for the vast majority of users)|
|>54dB(A)||Intolerable for home/office use, special applications only.|
*noise levels above this are not suggested for daily use
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
Machinus - Friday, January 15, 2021 - linkWhy no comparisons to the 360, the standard-sized radiator?
frbeckenbauer - Friday, January 15, 2021 - linkNoise normalized testing and a test without the VRM fan enabled are missing
TelstarTOS - Friday, January 15, 2021 - linkthey are ALWAYS missing here.
alexane - Sunday, January 24, 2021 - linkeasy job online from home. I have received exactly $20845 last month from this home job. Join now this job and start making extra cash online. salary8 . com
oRAirwolf - Friday, January 15, 2021 - linkIf you want a Gamers Nexus review, go watch the Gamers Nexus review.
Guspaz - Monday, January 18, 2021 - linkIt’s not a matter of wanting a gamers nexus level of detail, it’s a matter of noise-normalized thermals being the only review metric that actually matters (the only one that can actually be used to compare performance between multiple products), and it’s missing.
Calin - Friday, January 15, 2021 - linkAlso, no comment on the "quality" of noise - a while ago, there was the "low hum", "high pitch", ... subjective appreciation of the reviewer.
At least the table with "reference noise levels - decibels versus subjective feel" is there.
willis936 - Saturday, January 16, 2021 - linkThat’s caked into the dBa weighting.
AGentleMetalWave - Monday, January 18, 2021 - linkThe subjective aspect is important too. For example, coil whine can be low dBa but very annoying
scottlarm - Saturday, January 23, 2021 - linkNow you can get every month extra $23k or more easily by doing work in spare time. start you making dollars EWd 0nline just by follow details here... salary8 . com