AMD this afternoon has sent out a brief update to the public and investors, offering an update on the status of the ongoing Xilinx acquisition. AMD’s purchase of the FPGA maker, which was previous expected to close by the end of this year, is now expected to close in the first quarter of 2022. Attributing the setback to delays in regulatory approval, AMD believes they’ll be able to finally secure the necessary approval for the $35 billion deal next quarter.

As a quick refresher, AMD first announced their intention to buy Xilinx back in October of 2020. The FPGA maker was a lucrative target for AMD, whose sales (and market capitalization) have been growing by leaps and bounds over the last few years. This has brought AMD to the point where they are looking at diversification, as well as covering any gaps in their product lineup that would be holding them back in the server market. As the plan goes, acquiring Xilinx, will allow AMD to offer FPGAs alongside (and potentially integrated with) their current CPU and GPU/accelerator products.

The deal was previously expected to close by the end of 2021, and AMD has remained very tight lipped on the matter outside of their initial announcement. None the less, acquiring the necessary regulatory approval is apparently taking AMD longer than planned. According to the company they are not expecting to need to change the deal or alter any of its terms, but they will need another quarter to get the last approvals required to close the deal.

“We continue making good progress on the required regulatory approvals to close our transaction. While we had previously expected that we would secure all approvals by the end of 2021, we have not yet completed the process and we now expect the transaction to close in the first quarter of 2022. Our conversations with regulators continue to progress productively, and we expect to secure all required approvals.”

There are no additional changes to the previously announced terms or plans regarding the transaction and the companies continue to look forward to the proposed combination creating the industry’s high-performance and adaptive computing leader.

Source: AMD IR

POST A COMMENT

28 Comments

View All Comments

  • mode_13h - Monday, January 3, 2022 - link

    It's a lot easier to build a CPU with basically only one in-house customer, and Apple has been working on their cores longer than AMD has been doing Zen. Plus, x86 adds complexity.

    Let's see how Zen 4 shapes up. It should probably leap-frog Golden Cove, especially now that Intel took AVX-512 off the table.
    Reply
  • TheinsanegamerN - Monday, January 3, 2022 - link

    Show apple's M1 chip running a windows server application.

    Oh wait, it cant. OOPS.
    Reply
  • Spunjji - Wednesday, January 5, 2022 - link

    AMD, behind two substantially larger companies with functionally infinite R&D resources? NO WAY Reply
  • lemurbutton - Sunday, January 2, 2022 - link

    Good luck getting Windows to support custom blocks on a Zen processor. Reply
  • mode_13h - Monday, January 3, 2022 - link

    It's just like any other accelerator, really. Depending on how you want to use it, it can have either a generic device driver, or a custom device driver for a particular configuration.

    However, if they go down the path of integrating it into their CPUs, I doubt most of the use it gets will be in Windows.
    Reply
  • mode_13h - Monday, January 3, 2022 - link

    Meh, I'm not so sure it's really a game-changer. I think add-on FPGAs are probably good for optimizing simple things like packet-processing, but you need a non-trivial sized block to do any non-trivial amount of compute. GPUs and custom AI processors have better performance-density.

    I see it as a way that AMD can broaden their product portfolio, while trying to cover off some of the threat from AI accelerators. I'm still not sure it'll be effective at the latter. For that, they'd be better off buying someone like Tenstorrent or Cerebras.
    Reply
  • mode_13h - Monday, January 3, 2022 - link

    Oops, I meant to say "add-on FPGA blocks", as in something of the size you might integrate as a relatively small part of a compute or I/O die. Reply
  • JeffreyHF - Sunday, January 2, 2022 - link

    Look to how China slow-walked, then scuttled, the QCOM/NXPI deal, as a peek into the future of AMD/XLNX. And that was before the West destroyed Huawei, and China's chip aspirations. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now