From what little performance information I can find, the newest Atoms very roughly equivalent to Bulldozer-based CPUs (in general performance, not clock-for-clock).
Not bad for a office machine or general Internet browsing.
it depends on one's needs - an older adult does not need high resolution tree - or in fact younger with bad eyes. Also for word processing and internet browser you don't need that much horse power or memory. Not everyone in the world is gamer's . But it probably can run old games fine.
We are talking about a very low end SoC with a pretty unimpressive iGPU and a relatively tiny 11.6 inch screen aimed at hitting the lowest possible price point which it does at $239. AND it has a wired ethernet port. If Acer sells their low res version with a DIMM slot (or just starts with 8GB) and has NVMe rather than sticking us with soldered down eMMC, I'd be game for one since I don't really need to resolution for plinking around on the Internet.
Have you used a 1366x768 screen lately? Most current apps or web pages simply are designed for higher resolutions and just don't work correctly at such a low res. 1366x768 needs to die a horrible death.
Yes, both of my home laptops and my only external display are all 1366x768. That'd be an Acer Aspire ES1-111M-C7DE, an HP 635 (ancient Athlon P360 version), and a Walmart special TV screen that occasionally acts as a second display when I feel motivated enough to actually work at a desk rather than the kitchen table or from a couch. I don't have any problems with web pages and I use the HP 635 for quite a bit of heavy lifting (native OS is Linux Mint, but I push a few VMs through Virtual Box, supports my addiction to drawing , and it does video creation via kdenlive). Of those chores, kdenlive is really the only thing that could use a bit more screen real estate, but it's workabl enough.
Don't get me wrong, I agree that 1366x768 is something that really should die someday soon. You're right about it being sub-optimal and it has been less than great for a few years. However, my hobbies, side gigs, and fun all happen at that resolution right now and it doesn't really bother me much. My office laptop is some random HP 14 incher and it has a 1080 res screen. I just end up scaling it to the point where I have about the same amount of useable screen space as my home hardware so there isn't as much advantage until you start picking up larger desktop monitors which I just don't use at home..
We’ve updated our terms. By continuing to use the site and/or by logging into your account, you agree to the Site’s updated Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
12 Comments
Back to Article
HStewart - Wednesday, January 22, 2020 - link
What would be interesting is to see a laptop based on Tremont processor.For this low end type of computer it might be useful - especially just for internet and word processing.
thejaredhuang - Wednesday, January 22, 2020 - link
1080p, IPS, 8GB <$350. I call that progress.PixyMisa - Wednesday, January 22, 2020 - link
And the recent Atoms are finally not complete garbage.Great_Scott - Wednesday, January 22, 2020 - link
From what little performance information I can find, the newest Atoms very roughly equivalent to Bulldozer-based CPUs (in general performance, not clock-for-clock).Not bad for a office machine or general Internet browsing.
HStewart - Wednesday, January 22, 2020 - link
it depends on one's needs - an older adult does not need high resolution tree - or in fact younger with bad eyes. Also for word processing and internet browser you don't need that much horse power or memory. Not everyone in the world is gamer's . But it probably can run old games fine.geokon - Thursday, January 23, 2020 - link
Note that the USB-C port can be used for charginghttps://news.acer.com/acer-announces-the-travelmat...
damianrobertjones - Thursday, January 23, 2020 - link
I really, really thought that 1366x768 had finally vanished. 1080p at 200dpi would be far better. Maybe 2021 will be the year for progress?!PeachNCream - Thursday, January 23, 2020 - link
We are talking about a very low end SoC with a pretty unimpressive iGPU and a relatively tiny 11.6 inch screen aimed at hitting the lowest possible price point which it does at $239. AND it has a wired ethernet port. If Acer sells their low res version with a DIMM slot (or just starts with 8GB) and has NVMe rather than sticking us with soldered down eMMC, I'd be game for one since I don't really need to resolution for plinking around on the Internet.extide - Thursday, January 23, 2020 - link
Have you used a 1366x768 screen lately? Most current apps or web pages simply are designed for higher resolutions and just don't work correctly at such a low res. 1366x768 needs to die a horrible death.PeachNCream - Thursday, January 23, 2020 - link
Yes, both of my home laptops and my only external display are all 1366x768. That'd be an Acer Aspire ES1-111M-C7DE, an HP 635 (ancient Athlon P360 version), and a Walmart special TV screen that occasionally acts as a second display when I feel motivated enough to actually work at a desk rather than the kitchen table or from a couch. I don't have any problems with web pages and I use the HP 635 for quite a bit of heavy lifting (native OS is Linux Mint, but I push a few VMs through Virtual Box, supports my addiction to drawing , and it does video creation via kdenlive). Of those chores, kdenlive is really the only thing that could use a bit more screen real estate, but it's workabl enough.Don't get me wrong, I agree that 1366x768 is something that really should die someday soon. You're right about it being sub-optimal and it has been less than great for a few years. However, my hobbies, side gigs, and fun all happen at that resolution right now and it doesn't really bother me much. My office laptop is some random HP 14 incher and it has a 1080 res screen. I just end up scaling it to the point where I have about the same amount of useable screen space as my home hardware so there isn't as much advantage until you start picking up larger desktop monitors which I just don't use at home..
TheWereCat - Thursday, January 23, 2020 - link
So this can have 1080p at $329 but Dynabook can't at $1500Smithy299 - Monday, October 19, 2020 - link
I use Acer more than 3 years, perfecttechnoly for me.